×
Home
2024 Conference
All Conferences
Instructions
TSVC | Tourism Students Virtual Conference

Issues Facing Migrant Workers in the Tourism Sector: with Specific Reference to External Agencies in Hotels

Issues Facing Migrant Workers in the Tourism Sector: with Specific Reference to External Agencies in Hotels
Author: Kieran Haynes
1 Commentries
Abstract

There are groups who find themselves more vulnerable in all industries; migrants are firmly one of the most vulnerable groups. The aim of this paper is to identify some of the reasons for this vulnerability but also to show examples of what takes place in tourism and particularly hotels when external agencies are involved. Hopefully the findings from this paper will go some way to raising awareness and help stop this issue.

Keywords: Tourism, Migrants, External Agencies, Exploitation.

Investigating the Key Issues Facing Migrant Workers in the Tourism Sector, with Specific Reference to External Agencies in Hotels

Tourism is one of the biggest worldwide industries, it is forever evolving and different destinations emerge, this has led to economic geography especially with the increased salience of all-inclusive holidays, the combination of this and globalisation which has increased cross boarder mobility allowing travel between countries for work. This topic has been chosen for study to add another dimension to previous research by applying case studies this could go some way to stopping exploitation of migrants in the industry.

Tourism is the UK’s third biggest sector employing over 2 million workers, this industry often suffers from labour shortages, this combined with entry level tourism jobs traditionally being low skills provides employment opportunities for migrants.

Seasonality is a real problem in tourism this creates fluctuating employment demands which has resulted in an increased tendency for flexible/zero hour contracts, although these allow employees to have more of a say over their working hours, it doesn’t create any guarantee of weekly hours, employees find themselves at the mercy of employers.

Academics have previously looked into the reasons why businesses look to employ migrant workers, because they are perceived to be hard working with a good work ethics. However Mackenzie and Forde (2009) findings showed that migrants are more willing to accept lower wages, sometimes this is below the national minimum wage although this is illegal it is possible because migrants are unsure of the law and their employment rights in a foreign country.

This hasn’t always been the case between 2007 and early 2014 although being part of EU migrants from Bulgaria and Romania didn’t have an automatic right to work in the UK, however if they were to be self-employed they could work this was a loophole, however this brought along its own problems self-employed workers were treated the same as other employees except they had no job security and weren’t entitled to fringe benefits.

With reference to constructing workplace identities, this can be difficult when working on a part-time or flexible basis because employees can feel as if they aren’t an integral part of the team, the combination of entry level tourism jobs being low skilled and attracting employees who aren’t highly educated can resurrect tensions between the resident community and migrants. The resident community act like snakes in the grass and make it difficult for migrants by making them feel insignificant due to their perceived naive perceptions that migrants are here to take our jobs (Nanos & Schluter, 2014).

Looking into the issue surrounding external agencies, these companies provide opportunities for migrant workers, they have become increasing common in hotels over the years especially for housekeeping departments, this has proved the most cost effective way for hotels to employee housekeepers. However agencies workers aren’t entitled to the same fringe benefits as employees employed by the company outright.

Case studies from the BBC show that the use of external agencies in hotels has brought about more abuse, higher labour turnover as a result of low job security and a deterioration in working conditions, housekeepers often find themselves in the situation where they are presented with no suitable cleaning equipment, where shampoos and shower gels are used as an industrial cleaning element.

Case studies also unveil more problems migrants face when working for external agencies underpaying is common findings shows this can be from £70 up to £113, the reason given by Hotelcare (The external agency) is these employees haven’t cleaned two and half rooms per hour, although Delia Cannings from the British Institute of Cleaning Service stated a standard room should take 40 minutes to clean. This makes it almost impossible for new starters to earn the National Minimum Wage and therefore not getting their full wage, hours worked are also altered by the agencies, these are both illegal (BBC New, 2012) .

As well as having to deal with exploitation, housekeepers have poor working conditions many housekeepers suffer from back and shoulder problems due of the physical nature of work, statistics show 84 out of 100 housekeepers were in physical pain and had to take painkillers before work, the combination of this and the working conditions make many migrants feel they would be unable to work beyond 50 due to stress.

These findings are surprising when considering academics argue hotel success is only partly down to the quality of the product offered, in hotels service quality is key in shaping customers experiences and perceptions which determine the overall satisfaction with a brand, chain or business. Thus proving the old adage a king is only as strong as the army behind him, so the exploitation of migrants is harming businesses and the sectors reputation.


References

BBC News. (2012). Romanian Journalist goes Undercover as Hotel Cleaner. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-19756137. Last accessed: [27th April 2014].

Mackenzie, R., & Forde, C. (2009). The Rhetoric of the ‘Good Worker’ Verse the Realities of Employers use and the Experiences of Migrant Workers. Work Employment and Society. Vol 23(1), p142-159.

Nanos, P., & Schluter, C. (2014). The Composition of Wage Differentials Between Migrants and Natives. European Economic Review. Vol 65(1), p23-44.
A Commentary on the Issues Facing Migrant Workers in the Tourism Sector: with Specific Reference to External Agencies in Hotels
Author: Alexandra Matters
The main reason I have chosen to discuss and evaluate this paper is because the paper addresses similar factors debated in my paper concerning the exploitation of European migrant workers in the UK tourism and hospitality industry and this paper goes into further detail of how migrants are exploited using sourced examples.

The main area of the paper that interested me was reasons for the vulnerability of migrant workers and the sourced examples of what takes place in tourism in particularly hotels when external agencies are involved.

The similarities with this paper and mine are the employer’s perceptions of employing migrant workers; this paper found they are perceived to be hard working with a good work ethics. Lyon (2009) found that one hotels managers view of employing migrant workers was; “migrant workers are happy and willing to do a lot more hours, work longer hours than British and are not complaining that the job is hard. They are never off sick and they take any extra work.”

The difference with this paper compared to my paper is the findings of the paper that a hotels success is only partly down to the quality of the product and that the exploitation of migrants is harming businesses and the sectors reputation. However, my paper found some employers are simply exploiting those willing to work for low wages, which can then impact negatively on the quality of service the workers provide but Tokarzewska (2006) argued that this phenomenon had no effect on the quality of service provided by migrant workers are they preferred to be exploited in other countries rather than in their own country.

Overall this discussion paper is well structured, clear and raises awareness of the exploitation of migrant workers and the paper is an overall interesting read, however I have to disagree with what the conclusion of this paper, that; “the exploitation of migrants is harming businesses and the sectors reputation” as there is no conclusive evidence that exploiting migrant workers is harming businesses or the sectors reputation, I understand that there is a lot of negative media on exploiting migrants but is this really harming the businesses and sectors reputation as people are still staying in these hotels as the industry made £115 million from tourism in 2013. (Miller, 2013)

The one limitation of this paper would be that it doesn’t discuss unlike my paper how cultural diversity can be managed for future employment of migrant workers as stated in the paper hoped to go “some way to stopping the exploitation of migrant workers in the industry.”

References:

Lyon, A. and Sulcova, D. (2009) Hotel employer’s perceptions of employing Eastern European workers: A case study of Cheshire, UK. Tourism, Culture &Communications. Vol. 9, pp.17-28

Miller, M. (2013) Department for Culture, Media & Sport and Government Equalities Office: Speech by Culture Secretary Maria Miller at British Hospitality Association event. [Online] Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/british-hospitality-and-tourism-summit-2013 [Accessed: 10/05/14]

Tokarzewska, M. (2006) Is Poland facing a brain drain? A personal perspective on the impact of polish workers coming to work in the sector. [Online] Available from: http://www.people1st.co.uk/research.themes [Accessed: 16/04/14]