Grab a Bargain During Egypt’s Uncertain Security Environment.
Author: Carol Gargon
2 Commentries
Abstract: For tourists today an uncertain security environment and its attendant risks affect tourist behaviour. Lowering prices can help boost tourism, but at what cost?
Key words: Political unrest, safety and security, tourism perceived/actual risks, terrorist attacks, impacts on tourist behaviour.
Egypt’s security is most affected in times of heightened threats due to political instability and terrorism. Impacts on tourist behaviour from an uncertain political environment can include increased perceptions of travel risk. These perceptions can be perceived through sometimes negative news and media coverage who may not have assessed the impact on the message they wish to convey. For a more accurate guide government websites would be better visited to assess the actual risk which unfortunately at present includes the risks of further protests. These are aimed at government and not against foreigners; however attacks against foreigners cannot be ruled out it ‘would be advisable for tourists to stay away from demonstrations and large gatherings of people’ (Official Government Website 2014). More importantly at present there is an actual threat of terrorism attacks.
Safety and security are closely related to tourism and security is of ‘special consequence to tourism because of what is being sold for example serenity, leisure, fun, and comfort’ (Steiner 2010 p. 728). The political unrest which is causing safety and security concerns. In addition and of even more concern according to Sayed & Azim (2010), terrorist attacks against tourists now represent the Egyptian tourism industry’s greatest challenge (p. 31).
The consequence of the growing concern from government and images portrayed through news and media around safety and security in Egypt has meant our perception of security has become less secure, particularly for families travelling with young children. Holiday makers rely mainly upon the travel agencies for information about their holiday and issues regarding the continuing unpredictable security situation have fortunately been addressed by leading travel companies such as Thomas Cook who have taken measures to manage where tourists can and cannot go.
Perceived risks of attacks on tourists are now unfortunately becoming actual risks. The recent attack on 17th of April, when Egypt’s prime minister issued a warning to the tourism industry after a terror group claimed a suicide bombing on a bus which killed three South Korean tourists and threatened to stage more attacks (Telegraph (2014).
The impact from actual risk from such events is undesirable for tourism where tourists are concerned, especially first-time visitors who largely rely on destination images to guide the process of travel decision-making, and after the recent hard economic times people are more mindful of how they spend and a new car may be more of a priority and a better option than the prospect of a risky holiday, unless of course it was at the right price. That said however, issues may be that Egypt will be perceived as a low quality destination.
What one tourist perceives as risky is likely to differ from another as people all have individual characteristics and opinions. Stanley Plog, ‘a pioneer in the study of personality associated with travel, argues that traveller's experience fear or attraction depending on their personality’ (Cetinsoz & Ege 2013, p 175). In general impacts on tourist behaviour towards an unstable political environment may hinge on the understanding and perceived vulnerability of the tourists travel risks. Furthermore, previous tourist experience, demographic, socio-demographic and psychographic behaviour may also impact on tourist behaviour.
Challenges are, without the tourism industry and other stakeholders working together and taking seriously the responsibility of taking care of travellers in Egypt during this uncertain security environment, risks will continue to alter tourist demand patterns. A clear, honest, and committed approach to visitor safety and security through government and industry is essential. Already 2013 proved to be difficult year for the industry with tourist arrivals down by almost 18% to 9.5mn, and tourist receipts down by 41%, to US $5.9bn (Business Monitor 2014)
Research from Sayed & Azim (2010) found that it was ‘clear that using different sources of information about Egypt had a significant effect on the probability to modify tourist’s decisions of travel to Egypt as a result of fall in the prices’. However, a fall in pricing may not have the desired affect for sector in terms of layoffs in the tourism and hospitality industry, reduction of salaries and financial hardship that several hotels may suffer and could harm the image of Egypt through a drop in the level quality of services which may attract the lower spending tourists.
To conclude, increases in risk have changed the traveller’s perceptions of travel to Egypt. The industry forecast according to the Business Monitor 2014, states they retain a cautious outlook on the tourism sector in 2014. Making Egypt one of the cheapest holiday destinations may not be the way forward for the destination. Instead it might be better to approach visitor and safety security and for the travel industry to not only promote holidays but to consider risk and crisis management, giving up-do-date official advice for a holidays giving the tourist the option cancel their travel due to such high risks. However there will always be some who will take advantage of the opportunity to offer the cheap holiday offers, and those who will accept, without taking responsibility during the current uncertain security environment.
References
Official Government Website (2014) Foreign Travel Advice – Egypt, available online from https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/egypt/terrorism (accessed 17/4/14)
Business Monitor International (2014) Egypt Tourism Report, available online from www.businessmonitor.com
Sayed T., & Azim A.,(2010) The Relationship Between the Perception of Risk and the Decision Making Process of Travel of French Tourists: The Case of Eygpt, Tourismos: An International Journal Multidisciplinary Journal of Tourism, Vol. 5, Issue 2, pp 29-47
Key words: Political unrest, safety and security, tourism perceived/actual risks, terrorist attacks, impacts on tourist behaviour.
Egypt’s security is most affected in times of heightened threats due to political instability and terrorism. Impacts on tourist behaviour from an uncertain political environment can include increased perceptions of travel risk. These perceptions can be perceived through sometimes negative news and media coverage who may not have assessed the impact on the message they wish to convey. For a more accurate guide government websites would be better visited to assess the actual risk which unfortunately at present includes the risks of further protests. These are aimed at government and not against foreigners; however attacks against foreigners cannot be ruled out it ‘would be advisable for tourists to stay away from demonstrations and large gatherings of people’ (Official Government Website 2014). More importantly at present there is an actual threat of terrorism attacks.
Safety and security are closely related to tourism and security is of ‘special consequence to tourism because of what is being sold for example serenity, leisure, fun, and comfort’ (Steiner 2010 p. 728). The political unrest which is causing safety and security concerns. In addition and of even more concern according to Sayed & Azim (2010), terrorist attacks against tourists now represent the Egyptian tourism industry’s greatest challenge (p. 31).
The consequence of the growing concern from government and images portrayed through news and media around safety and security in Egypt has meant our perception of security has become less secure, particularly for families travelling with young children. Holiday makers rely mainly upon the travel agencies for information about their holiday and issues regarding the continuing unpredictable security situation have fortunately been addressed by leading travel companies such as Thomas Cook who have taken measures to manage where tourists can and cannot go.
Perceived risks of attacks on tourists are now unfortunately becoming actual risks. The recent attack on 17th of April, when Egypt’s prime minister issued a warning to the tourism industry after a terror group claimed a suicide bombing on a bus which killed three South Korean tourists and threatened to stage more attacks (Telegraph (2014).
The impact from actual risk from such events is undesirable for tourism where tourists are concerned, especially first-time visitors who largely rely on destination images to guide the process of travel decision-making, and after the recent hard economic times people are more mindful of how they spend and a new car may be more of a priority and a better option than the prospect of a risky holiday, unless of course it was at the right price. That said however, issues may be that Egypt will be perceived as a low quality destination.
What one tourist perceives as risky is likely to differ from another as people all have individual characteristics and opinions. Stanley Plog, ‘a pioneer in the study of personality associated with travel, argues that traveller's experience fear or attraction depending on their personality’ (Cetinsoz & Ege 2013, p 175). In general impacts on tourist behaviour towards an unstable political environment may hinge on the understanding and perceived vulnerability of the tourists travel risks. Furthermore, previous tourist experience, demographic, socio-demographic and psychographic behaviour may also impact on tourist behaviour.
Challenges are, without the tourism industry and other stakeholders working together and taking seriously the responsibility of taking care of travellers in Egypt during this uncertain security environment, risks will continue to alter tourist demand patterns. A clear, honest, and committed approach to visitor safety and security through government and industry is essential. Already 2013 proved to be difficult year for the industry with tourist arrivals down by almost 18% to 9.5mn, and tourist receipts down by 41%, to US $5.9bn (Business Monitor 2014)
Research from Sayed & Azim (2010) found that it was ‘clear that using different sources of information about Egypt had a significant effect on the probability to modify tourist’s decisions of travel to Egypt as a result of fall in the prices’. However, a fall in pricing may not have the desired affect for sector in terms of layoffs in the tourism and hospitality industry, reduction of salaries and financial hardship that several hotels may suffer and could harm the image of Egypt through a drop in the level quality of services which may attract the lower spending tourists.
To conclude, increases in risk have changed the traveller’s perceptions of travel to Egypt. The industry forecast according to the Business Monitor 2014, states they retain a cautious outlook on the tourism sector in 2014. Making Egypt one of the cheapest holiday destinations may not be the way forward for the destination. Instead it might be better to approach visitor and safety security and for the travel industry to not only promote holidays but to consider risk and crisis management, giving up-do-date official advice for a holidays giving the tourist the option cancel their travel due to such high risks. However there will always be some who will take advantage of the opportunity to offer the cheap holiday offers, and those who will accept, without taking responsibility during the current uncertain security environment.
References
Official Government Website (2014) Foreign Travel Advice – Egypt, available online from https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/egypt/terrorism (accessed 17/4/14)
Business Monitor International (2014) Egypt Tourism Report, available online from www.businessmonitor.com
Sayed T., & Azim A.,(2010) The Relationship Between the Perception of Risk and the Decision Making Process of Travel of French Tourists: The Case of Eygpt, Tourismos: An International Journal Multidisciplinary Journal of Tourism, Vol. 5, Issue 2, pp 29-47