Should we visit poverty ? Slum Tourism: The Example of Favela Tourism in Rio de Janeiro
Author: Quentin Leroy
1 Commentries
Abstract: This paper discusses the main issues of slum tourism in the favelas of Rio de Janeiro. It shows how controversial it is, how difficult it is to weight up the pros and the cons and how related it is with more general issues.
Keywords: Slum tourism, Rio, poverty, ethic.
Slum Tourism is one of the segments of niche tourism which experienced the most important development in the last few years. It consists in visiting poor urban areas. Most of the big cities of the developing countries have their variant of slum tourism. It has been popularised since a few years in the media for example with the film Slumdog Millionaire (2009) and the number of academic writings about it have largely increased. Rio de Janeiro is an interesting example to examine this phenomenon because it was here the first company offering slum tours was created in 1992. The fact that the country is about to host the Football World Cup and, in 2016, the Olympic Games makes the case study even more interesting because slum tourism is already a controversial form of tourism but in such a context – when we can expect an important increase of tourists – the issues might be strengthened. “Should we visit the favelas?†could be the question that some tourists in Rio would ask themselves and this is a totally relevant question because visiting poor areas could be considered as unethical and it could remind us the slumming activity of the wealthy in East End London during the Victorian period. But is slum tourism still about this ?
The first argument in favour of favela tourism would be the cultural importance of the favelas in the Brazilian culture. The favelas are indeed an important part of Brazilian identity. Samba which is a famous Brazilian dance associated with the Brazilian carnival was for example invented in the favelas and nowadays most of the school of samba are located in the favelas. Moreover, the favelas, in Rio de Janeiro, are almost always visible wherever you are and represent an important part of the landscape therefore they cannot be ignored.
Another positive aspect is the fact that favela tourism is also beneficial for the favelas. Most of the local residents have a good opinion of the presence of the tourists in their favela. Indeed they say that tourists are a good thing for the local economy, they bring money in the favelas since most of the time a part of the benefits made by the tourist companies is saved to support social projects but also thanks to the souvenirs or the food they buy. It is also beneficial for the image of the favelas which are often associated with violence, drug and insecurity. Thanks to these tours people from all over the world can see that the stereotypes spread by the media are not always a reality.
However some other arguments could make us think that favela tourism is negative. These arguments deal mostly with ethic and morality. The main reproach made to these favela tours is their voyeuristic dimension. The opponents of this form of tourism say the tours rely on the romanticization of poverty. They think that people are more here to experience, to see poverty than to have a real cultural exchange. Besides it is interesting to notice that most of the companies associate their tour with adventure tourism, promising a sensational experience. A company even drives its tourists in a Jeep like for a safari.
Another embarrassing aspect of slum tourism in the favelas is the social and cultural shock implied by these tours. Firstly who would not find it inappropriate that people having very good living conditions came to visit the favelas during three hours and came back in their comfortable hotel afterwards as if they only came back from a visit in a museum. With these tours two different worlds are put face to face and the interaction seems to be very difficult. The difference in living condistions is not the only barrier. There is also the language barrier because very few people speak English in the favelas and very few tourists speak Portuguese.
Finally it appears that the question has not a concrete answer. The pros and the cons are difficult to weight up. Favela tourism relies mainly on contradictions and implies more general and complex issues such as the role of the State in this phenomenon. This State which is spending billions for the Football World Cup thinks that by simply advertising slum tourism in its favelas it will improve the living standard of the residents thanks to the support of the companies and the charity of the tourists. Actually even if these incomes are helpful they are sporadic and quite insignificant face to the scope of the social gap which is to fill. To conclude it seems logical that a form of tourism relying on poverty cannot be the answer to poverty itself. The answer to this controversy might be to develop a form of tourism more in tune with the local communities and with the space, a more organized tourism, with some amenities which would make of the favelas more than a mere place of sightseeing tours.
References:
Frenzel, Fabian, Ko Koens, and Malte Steinbrink. Slum Tourism: Poverty, Power and Ethics. New York: Routledge, 2012.
“Rio’s Favela Tours: Helpful or Just an Exercise in Voyeurism?,†May 12, 2011. http://www.brazzil.com/
“Slum/Favela/Poverty Tourism.†Tourism Concern, http://www.tourismconcern.org.uk/